Which strategy is NOT part of qualitative validity?

Qualitative validity focuses on ensuring that research findings accurately represent the phenomena being studied, emphasizing the depth and context of qualitative data. A key component of qualitative research is the use of strategies that enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the findings.

Triangulation involves using multiple data sources or methods to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic, thereby strengthening the validity of the results. Rich descriptions enhance qualitative validity by providing in-depth, nuanced accounts of the participants' experiences, which helps to convey the context and meanings that may be missed with more superficial descriptions. Peer debriefing is a strategy where researchers engage with colleagues to discuss the research process and findings, which can help identify biases and strengthen the interpretation of the data.

In contrast, random sampling is primarily associated with quantitative research, where it is used to ensure that samples are representative of a larger population. This sampling method does not align with qualitative research's emphasis on in-depth exploration of specific cases and contexts; instead, qualitative research often employs purposive or theoretical sampling methods to select participants who can provide rich, relevant data. Therefore, random sampling is not considered a strategy for qualitative validity.